Please tell us a little about yourself, upbringing, family, interests etc.
Growing up in Devonport, I joined the Navy at 15. After 8 years of service I worked in the mining industry throughout remote Australia. After starting a maintenance consulting company, I returned home to Tasmania so my children could grow up in the place I love. After being frustrated by the direction Tasmania was heading in, I stood for election in 2010 and have been privileged to represent the community since then. My Christian beliefs and friends at my church give me a sound foundation for my role as a representative. I enjoy mountain biking, sport, fishing and shooting.
What are the top two priorities you want to achieve for your electorate
To continue to create jobs and opportunity for everyone in the community, but in particular our youth. I understand the need to allow business to create the jobs we need and I will continue to focus on making sure those opportunities are available.
With the budget back on track I am also focused on ensuring we provide the services that those in need require. With my ongoing work within the community my focus is on delivering better health and education outcomes. We have made significant improvements, however there is still a lot more to do.
Euthanasia has been rejected by the Tasmanian Parliaments in 1998, 2009, 2013 and 2017. Would you oppose or support any future attempts to legalise euthanasia in Tasmania?
I have voted twice against the Euthanasia legislation in Parliament and my record and stance is very consistent. Whilst no one wants to see the suffering people face with terminal illness, voluntary euthanasia is a massive change for our community. I don’t feel there can be adequate protections put in place to legislate this change and as such my position has not changed. That is why I have voted against the previous legislation and would not support the same legislation into the future.
How would you like to be remembered as a politician?
As someone that cares and stands up for the community. Whilst I’m not your typical politician that fits the mould, I am there to make sure the community is represented. We live in a special place, and when I leave we should be in an even better place. My personal circumstances have been challenging recently, but through adversity we learn, and through our faith we know things will work out. I am not one to cut and run and there is a lot more to do.
Drugs continue to wreak havoc in our community. Some are suggesting the decriminalisation of small volume use and possession of illicit drugs. Would you support or oppose legislation to enable this?
The Tasmanian Liberals will not decriminalise illicit drugs, nor introduce legislation to do so. Nor will we support legislation introduced by another political party.
Illicit drug use can lead to significant social problems, including family violence and child abuse. We will reduce the supply, demand and harms associated with the abuse and misuse of illicit drugs. See www.tas.liberal.org.au for all election policies.
In contrast, the Greens have a clear policy to remove criminal penalties for personal illicit drug use and in 2017, Labor voted in favour of the "decriminalisation of small volume use and possession of illicit drugs".
According to a 2013 Galaxy poll, the majority of Tasmanians oppose late term abortions except in cases of severe disability. Despite this, Tasmania's abortion law continues to allow abortion up until birth. Would you support or oppose an amendment to legislation to repeal the provision of late term (post 24 weeks) abortions except when a mother's life is in danger?
The Tasmanian Liberals have no plans to change the current laws. Should another political party bring such laws to Parliament, my Members will be allowed a conscience vote, as they have in previous years when legislation related to the termination of pregnancy has been debated.
Do you support faith-based organisations' current right to, if they so choose, restrict employment or enrolment to those who share their ethos, just like political parties do?
Such rights already exist. Faith-based organisations are able to seek exemption from the Anti-Discrimination Act, subject to conditions set by the independent Commissioner, and limited to a period of not more than three years. Extensions can be sought. Exemptions enable faithbased organisations to employ persons based on religion or participation in religious observance.
Do you agree with state funding of education programs that teach contested gender theory (like the so called Safe Schools Programme?)
The Liberals will continue to provide safe and supportive learning environments, for all students and staff. We have put in place a new $3 million Combatting Bullying Initiative that will provide practical support to schools to ensure that all students feel safe and valued in their school community.
Poker machines cause a great deal of social harm to vulnerable Tasmanians. Over $15 million is lost monthly on poker machines in Tasmania, with a significant portion of this attributed to the estimated 8000 problem or moderate-risk gamblers. Do you support legislation for a $ I bet limit? What other measures do you support to help at-risk Tasmanians and their families?
The Liberals' policy is available at www.tas.liberal.org.au
Tasmania's harm minimisation framework is already recognised as national best practice and
99.5% of Tasmanians are not problem gamblers. The Liberals will:
- reduce the cap on poker machines by 150;
- end the monopoly;
- allow venues to licence, own and operate machines, increasing returns to pubs and clubs to invest in economic activity and jobs;
- increase returns for government to invest in schools and hospitals;
- double the Community Support Levy to around $9 million per year, providing a bigger pool for harm minimisation, preventative health and support for community sporting activities and facilities.
Prostitution degrades women by objectifying them as commodities for men's sexual gratification. Internationally, policies discouraging demand for sexual services are proving to be the most effective way of limiting both the size of and the harms resulting from prostitution. The progressive "Nordic model" criminalises the buyer of sex, not the provider, and provides viable pathways for those wishing to exit prostitution. Would you support an inquiry into the suitability of the Nordic approach to help vulnerable women in Tasmania?
The Liberal Party has no plans to change existing laws