Please tell us a little about yourself – your upbringing, family, interests etc.
Information about Tasmanian Greens candidates is available at: https://greens.org.au/candidates/tas
What are the top two priorities that you want to achieve for your electorate?
A prosperous, low-carbon economy powered by renewable energy, and a passionate voice for people with disabilities, refugees, children and marginalized Tasmanians.
Euthanasia has been rejected by Tasmanian parliaments in 1998, 2009, 2013 and 2017.
Would you oppose or support any future attempts to legalise euthanasia in Tasmania?
The Tasmanian Greens strongly support the right of Tasmanians suffering from advanced, incurable, unrelievable suffering that palliation cannot alleviate to choose the time and manner of their death.
Drugs continue to wreak havoc in our community. Some are suggesting the decriminalisation of small volume use and possession of illicit drugs.
Would you support or oppose legislation to enable this?
The Tasmanian Greens strongly support treating personal drug use as a health issue rather than a criminal issue.
The Greens will:
- uphold criminal penalties, including imprisonment, for the supply of illicit drugs and the possession of illicit drugs above quantities consistent with personal use;
- legislate civil sanctions for the personal use of illicit drugs to include diversion programs, compulsory treatment, education programs and penalties;
- provide increased availability of diversion to rehabilitation, treatment and recovery programs as a sentencing alternative for people convicted of possession for personal use;
According to a 2013 Galaxy poll, the majority of Tasmanians oppose late term abortions except in cases of severe disability. Despite this, Tasmania’s abortion law continues to allow abortion up until birth.
Would you support or oppose an amendment to legislation to repeal the provision of late term (post-24 weeks) abortions except when a mother’s life is in danger?
The Tasmanian Greens would oppose an amendment to repeal the provision of late term abortions. It is inconsistent with good medical practice for the following reasons:
- it imposes an arbitrary definition of ‘late term’—24 weeks—which is inconsistent with best medical practice;
- it attempts to legislate health care, and it will have many unintended consequences, including undermining the professional relationship between a patient and her doctor by requiring the doctor to do certain things even when those things are against his or her professional or ethical judgement; and
- it does not take into account the last decades of advances in the way all aspects of pregnancy, including premature births, are now dealt with.
Do you support faith-based organisations’ current right to, if they so choose, restrict employment or enrolment to those who share their ethos, just like political parties do?
The Tasmanian Greens do not support any weakening of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1998.
Do you agree with state funding of educational programmes that teach contested gender theory (like the so called Safe Schools Programme)?
Fact: Safe Schools does not teach radical gender theory. It is simply a program to help schools and students understand and respect that people should not be discriminated against for any reason - including gender and sexual diversity.
The Tasmanian Greens strongly support the right of every child to feel safe from bullying, particularly at school.
The Safe Schools programme has been designed to ensure schools are safe places for all students, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) students, and are free of discrimination.
It was born out of the need identified by school communities, parents and teachers for greater support for LGBTI students, who are at higher risks of bullying and suicide, and to ensure that schools create safe and inclusive environments.
Poker machines cause a great deal of social harm to vulnerable Tasmanians. Over $15 million is lost monthly on poker machines in Tasmania, with a significant portion of this attributed to the estimated 8000 problem or moderate-risk gamblers.
A. Do you support legislating for a $1 bet limit?
B. What other measures do you support to help at-risk Tasmanians and their families?
The Tasmanian Greens strongly support the removal of poker machines from all pubs and clubs and legislating for pre-commitments and $1 bet limits, as recommended by the 2010 Productivity Commission review.
The Greens will ensure that casinos have to contribute to the Community Support Levy.
Further exploration of innovative regulatory measures would be initiated, including measures such as quarantining winnings until the end of the session, using alarm clocks for setting time reminders, and requiring a “demo mode” which allows for playing without money.
Prostitution degrades women by objectifying them as commodities for men’s sexual gratification. Internationally, policies discouraging demand for sexual services are proving to be the most effective way of limiting both the size of and the harms resulting from prostitution. The progressive “Nordic model” criminalises the buyer of sex, not the provider, and provides viable pathways for those wishing to exit prostitution.
Would you support an inquiry into the suitability of the Nordic approach to help vulnerable women in Tasmania?
The Tasmanian Greens strongly support an end to the criminalisation of consensual adult sex work.
The Greens support the position of sex workers in Australia who are vehemently opposed to the introduction of the Swedish model in Australia, claiming it significantly increases the physical, financial and emotional risks to people who choose to do sex work, while providing no benefit or safety to the people who may be trying to escape it.
How would you like to be remembered as a politician?
The Tasmanian Greens seek to make a difference and leave the planet a better place for our children.