News Item

Retain the oath in trials

You may have read this headline in the Australian of 19 April 2023 “Religious jurors more likely to find secular defendants guilty.” It is not true.

This the main finding of the study was that “Overall, the defendant was not considered guiltier when affirming rather than swearing, nor did mock-juror belief in God moderate this effect.”

The publicised conclusion and the article are a long way separated from the fact. The claim of discrimination is an assertion not a finding. The study also shows that jurors who affirmed discriminated in that they were more likely to find defendant not guilty. That too may be a bias.

The study does nothing substantial to take account of submissions, evidence, judge’s direction and most importantly jury deliberations. Artificial research leads to poor conclusions.

The oath is a significant part of our trial system and must be retained.

More from our blog…

a group of people standing in front of a crowd

WA Rally for Life

This years Rally for Life at the WA Parliament drew a crowd of close to 2000 people, much the same as last year.    The Rally marked the 25th Anniversary of

Vic: Drag Queen Story Time

You may have heard that the Victorian Government recently held a Drag Queen Story Time (DQST) in Parliament House, ostensibly to oppose bigotry. The Premier and other ministers and Labor