Gender & Sexuality
Freedoms & Public Christianity
Sexualisation of Society
Poverty and Justice
Pray for Parliament
Pages tagged "surrogacy"
MR: ACL urges support for child-friendly amendments to Tas Surrogacy Bill
· April 12, 2011 10:00 AM
For release: Tuesday 12
The Australian Christian Lobby today urged Tasmanian MPs to back amendments to the Surrogacy Bill designed to ensure children were not deprived of a mother and a father.
“MPs have a solemn duty to put the rights of children above the rights of adults,” ACL’s Tasmanian Director Mark Brown said.
“This means that where the State makes policy for children it must ensure the right of a child to at least begin life with a mother and a father is upheld.”
Mr Brown commended the Liberal Party for putting forward amendments which prohibited single men and same-sex couples from accessing surrogacy but said the prohibition should be extended to single women as well.
“It is not lacking in compassion to put the rights of a child above even the heart-felt desires of adults for a child. As a society we must err on the side of the child,” Mr Brown said.
Debate on the Surrogacy Bill resumes in Parliament today.
MR Surrogacy debate is not a platform for abusive language
· April 06, 2011 10:00 AM
For release: Wednesday 6
The Australian Christian Lobby said it was not acceptable for the debate around surrogacy to invoke abusive language by groups such as the Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group.
Tasmanian State Director Mark Brown said the gay lobby group’s comments to those who opposed surrogacy for same-sex couples as “pure and unadulterated, homophobic prejudice” sought to intimidate people out of voicing their concerns for children.
“While the Australian Christian Lobby believes surrogacy for same-sex couples and singles is wrong, because it denies the child to start life with a mother and father, the comments aimed at those who opposed altruistic surrogacy for same-sex couples, in this case the Liberal party, were out of line,” he said.
“There has to be room in our public discourse for those who believe in marriage and family to have the freedom to speak and contribute without immediately being intimidated by abusive language.
“Nobody can enter this debate from a perspective of marriage and family without being hit over the head with abusive language and this is totally inappropriate.
“Not even the Prime Minister has been immune from accusations of homophobia when Liberal MP and gay rights advocate Warren Entsch rejected her speech criticising the Greens for not sharing the values of average Australians when it comes to family. Mr Entsch reportedly said it would leave her open to the suspicion she was homophobic.
“There has to be room in our public discourse for those who believe in marriage and family to have the freedom to speak and contribute without immediately being intimidated by abusive language,” he said.
MR: Tasmanian surrogacy bill forgets child’s rights
· April 06, 2011 10:00 AM
For release: Wednesday 6
The Australian Christian Lobby today called on Tasmanian politicians to amend the Surrogacy Bill 2011 to ensure that a child’s right to at least begin life with a mother and father is upheld.
ACL Tasmanian Director Mark Brown said the Attorney General David Bartlett comments the legislation was about removing discrimination and allowing surrogacy for all people, regardless of their marital status or sexual orientation, elevated the rights of the adults above the rights of the child.
“While we understand the heart-felt desire of adults to have children, we should not be placing those desires above the rights of a child to have both a mother and a father. Children are not commodities and their interests should always come before the desires of adults,” Mr Brown said.
Mr Brown said it was vital that the Government consider the best interests of children and to separate the bill into two issues: heterosexual surrogacy and homosexual and single parent surrogacy.
“There needs to be consistency in surrogacy legislation – if it's going to be considered, all children who are produced through surrogacy should have the rights to begin with a mother and father,” he said.
“Clearly it is not in the best interests of children for the State to allow them to be conceived through assisted reproductive technology and then placed in an unnatural family construct that denies them a mother or a father.
Mr Brown said surrogacy was a very sensitive issue but those supporting the rights of a child to a mother and father should be free to advocate this without fear of intimidation and accusations of bigotry.
Tas surrogacy debate begins
· April 05, 2011 10:00 AM
Debate on the Surrogacy Bill 2011 and the associated amendments bill is scheduled to begin in Tasmania’s Lower House today. The bills, which are likely to be the subject of lengthy discussion, would allow singles and same sex couples to acquire a child via a surrogate.
The Liberals are yet to show their hand on this important legislation, while the ALP will vote as a party in support of surrogacy. David Bartlett yesterday told ABC radio that due to the complex nature of the bills it may be next month before they are debated in the Legislative Council.
Please therefore continue to make your concerns known to members of both houses via the ‘Kids’ rights count’ campaign at
. The website contains comprehensive information on the issue of surrogacy and makes contacting MPs quick and easy.
Protect kids' rights in Tas surrogacy debate
· March 17, 2011 11:00 AM
The ACL has launched its "Kids' rights count" campaign in response to the recent tabling of the Surrogacy Bill in Tasmania, which would allow singles and same sex couples to acquire a baby.
Surrogacy is a process whereby a woman agrees to carry a child to birth, before relinquishing care of the child to his or her ‘intended parent(s)’.
Whilst the sentiment of the bill seems commendable – assisting childless couples to become parents as a last resort – the bill is a minefield for children, who could be commissioned to be placed in homes without a mother or father, often deliberately separated from their biological parent(s).
This campaign is to ‘make a stand’ on behalf of the yet born, whose voice is tragically never heard in a debate of this nature – even when it centres on the wellbeing and best interests of children!
Please visit the ‘Kids’ rights count’ campaign at
to email your Lower and Upper House members about this bill. The site contains plenty of information on this important legislation, and helpful hints on what to write to your local MP.
ACL understands that the ALP will vote as a party bloc on this controversial legislation, no doubt putting some its members in an awkward position. The Liberals are yet to decide their position. Your contribution to the debate will go a long way in shaping its outcome. Please act NOW!
Media Release: Tasmanian Parliament should focus on running the state, not wasting time revisiting Greens’ social agendas
· March 07, 2011 11:00 AM
For release: 7th of March, 2011
With Parliament resuming tomorrow, the Australian Christian Lobby has called on Parliamentarians not to waste valuable time on Greens’ inspired radical social legislation such as euthanasia which has already been considered and rejected.
ACL’s Tasmanian State Director Mark Brown said there were important issues facing the State and legislators should not be distracted revisiting issues many of them had already spent days working on in Parliamentary inquiries and debate in the house.
“Days of parliamentary time have already been used debating euthanasia legislation which was rejected by the Tasmania Parliament as recently as November 2009 by 15 votes to nine,” he said.
“Euthanasia and assisted suicide advocate Dr Phillip Nitschke is presumptuously planning for a euthanasia clinic in anticipation for legislation to be passed this year.
“Legalising voluntary euthanasia is the intentional taking of innocent human life, which is contrary to the intent of the law to protect human life.
“Safeguards against abuse in euthanasia law have proven inadequate in protecting the lives of vulnerable elderly and sick patients who are made to feel a burden by such laws.
“It is not clear what new information the Greens can offer to allay the well-documented problems around designing euthanasia laws that don’t result in the abuse of vulnerable people or the de-funding of palliative care services,” he said.
Mr Brown was also concerned about proposed surrogacy legislation which would allow singles and same-sex couples to commission babies through surrogacy, deliberately denying a child the right to a mother or father.
The Parliament also looks set to revisit brothel laws but both Labor and Liberal had agreed to investigate the Swedish model which penalises the purchaser of a woman’s body.
“With recent debate again on the size of parliament, resources could be better utilised focussing on issues that have wider public outcomes.
“Our politicians need to focus on making sure the economy is running strongly, overhauling our broken child protection system and reducing hospital waiting times,” Mr Brown said.
Media Contact: Katherine Spackman on 0408 875 979.
New Tasmanian premier behind laws of concern to Christians
· January 27, 2011 11:00 AM
Tasmania’s new Premier Lara Giddings is the architect of a raft of proposed law changes of concern to Christians.
As Attorney General, she flagged surrogacy for same-sex couples, euthanasia, a charter of rights and legal brothels for Parliamentary debate this year.
Given these are also supported by the Greens, which share Government with Labor in Tasmania, ACL will be working hard to activate Christians to the injustices that stem from these agendas to children and other vulnerable members of society.
Ms Giddings replaces David Bartlett who stepped down to spend more time with his family.
ACL was disappointed last year when then Mr Barlett went back on his word and formed the minority government with the Greens after the March 2010 election. He had said on the
: “Because a back room deal with the Greens is a deal with the devil, and I'm am - am not going to sell my soul for the sake of remaining in power.”
During ACL’s Make It Count forum before the 2010 election, Mr Bartlett had made a commitment to further examine the Swedish model for criminalising men for purchasing sex, rather than legalising brothels. The ACL hopes Ms Giddings will honour this commitment.
Adult desires could trump kids’ rights in Tasmanian surrogacy push
· December 08, 2010 11:00 AM
The Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) today urged the Tasmanian Government not to go down the same path as Victoria and Queensland in allowing two men, two women and even single people to acquire a baby through surrogacy – thereby depriving the children of the complementary love and care of a mother and a father.
ACL Managing Director Jim Wallace said surrogacy was fraught with emotional, biological and legal complexities for children, as well as for women who carry someone else’s baby.
“We urge Tasmanians to put forward their concerns on this issue and for the Tasmanian Government to ensure that they engage in genuine consultation rather than treating the legalisation of surrogacy as a fait accompli,” Mr Wallace said.
“If the Government does decide to proceed with changing the laws we would urge all political parties to allow their members a conscience vote on the issue.”
Mr Wallace said it was vital that the Government consider the best interests of children and, if they go ahead with legalising surrogacy, to restrict it to infertile heterosexual couples and to ensure that significant safeguards are in place.
These include ensuring surrogacy only occurs within the context of a committed relationship between a man and a woman and only when there is a genetic link between the arranged parents and the child.
“While we understand the heart-felt desire of adults to have children, we should not be placing those desires above the rights of a child to have both a mother and a father. Children are not commodities and their interests should always come before the desires of adults,” Mr Wallace said.
“Clearly it is not in the best interests of children for the State to allow them to be conceived through assisted reproductive technology and then placed in an unnatural family construct that denies them a mother or a father.”
NSW parliament passes surrogacy law
· November 11, 2010 11:00 AM
Last night the NSW Government’s
Surrogacy Bill 2010
was passed by the NSW Legislative Assembly.
While the often strong desire of people to have children is fully understandable, ACL does not support surrogacy because of concerns for the welfare of children born through surrogacy arrangements and also for the mental and physical health of birth mothers.
Whilst, it is extraordinary to think that surrogacy has been largely unregulated in NSW for such a long period of time, the Surrogacy Bill does not go far enough to protect the rights of children to be raised by a mother and a father.
If the Government is to regulate surrogacy then we urge them to ensure that children have the benefit of the love and role models of both a mother and a father – something we believe there is broad community support for.
Surrogacy legislation does not go far enough to protect children’s rights
· October 22, 2010 11:00 AM
The Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) today urged NSW parliamentarians to ensure children born into State-backed surrogacy arrangements have the benefit of the complementary love and care of both a mother and a father.
ACL NSW Director David Hutt said that in moving to regulate surrogacy in NSW, the parliament at the very least should be putting legislative protections in place to ensure that children born into these arrangements in the future are not deprived of having both a mum and a dad.
“While we understand the desire of adults to have children, we should not be placing those desires above the rights of a child to have both a mother and a father. Children are not commodities and their interests should always come before the desires of adults,” Mr Hutt said.
Mr Hutt said while there is clearly a need to regulate surrogacy, the
does not go far enough. If the NSW Surrogacy Bill goes ahead in its current form it would mean that two men or two women would with State backing be able to put in an order for a baby through surrogacy.
“Clearly it is not in the best interests of children for the State to allow them to be conceived through surrogacy arrangements and then placed in an unnatural family construct that denies them a mother or a father,” he said.
“This is a form of social engineering and experimentation with children which would further undermine the natural family in a way that would be of great concern to many people in NSW.”
Mr Hutt urged NSW parliamentarians to fully consider the social implications of the legislation and at the very least amend it to ensure that future children born through surrogacy arrangements have the benefit of both a mother and a father.
“The Australian Christian Lobby does not support surrogacy at all. We believe that governments should be concerned about the genetic bewilderment and relational and legal consequences of surrogacy even where married heterosexual couples are involved. However if the Government is putting laws in place to regulate surrogacy then we urge them to ensure that children have the benefit of the love and role models of both a mother and a father – something we believe there is broad community support for,” he said.
Media Contact: Glynis Quinlan on 0408 875 979
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with Twitter
Sign in with Email
Optional email code
Get instant access to news about political issues facing christians